Final thoughts Vitel Payday Nevertheless is not the case

Most Expensive House Office in America is Steve Kagen’s

On last Mon­day, the House did some­thing for the first time ever.

Thanks to a change in its own trans­parency laws, the quar­terly expense report of the House is finally online.  Prior to this change, one would have to get a look at this report one of two ways.

The hard way: Request a copy of the report (typ­i­cally in three vol­umes, each 1000+ pages in size) from the House Com­mit­tee on Admin­is­tra­tion which acts as a sort of Mayor’s office for the House; if they have a copy lying around, they might give you one.

The easy way: Have a friend who works as a House staffer and ask them if you can page threw it.

Since Politico is what Politico is, it ran a story on this news the only way they knew how; a sen­sa­tional story about Speaker Pelosi buy­ing $2993 worth of flow­ers. That’s fine and all, but as much of a waste of tax­payer dol­lars (as well as odd pur­chase) that might be, it’s noth­ing com­pared to what other mem­bers might be using on such things as frank­ing priv­i­leges and print­ing of mate­ri­als.  That’s the trea­sure trove of infor­ma­tion this new dis­clo­sure now gives Americans.

For the first time ever, you can now find out how much your indi­vid­ual Con­gress­man is spend­ing in his Con­gres­sional office with­out mak­ing a spe­cial trip to Wash­ing­ton.  So, with that weapons cache in tow, blog­gers and jour­nal­ists have been pour­ing over the report avail­able either at the Office of the House’s Chief Admin­is­tra­tive Offi­cer or the Sun­light Foun­da­tion.  Some of them — like this one in New Mex­ico – have begun com­pil­ing lists of the biggest Con­gres­sional spenders for the third quar­ter of 2009.

At the top: Appleton’s own Steve Kagen.

Accord­ing to the report, U.S. Rep. Ben Ray Luján of Santa Fe spent more than $337,000 on his office between June and Sep­tem­ber and $808,000 in the first nine months of the year. That seems like a lot, but it’s less than New Mexico’s other two con­gress­men. Mar­tin Hein­rich of Albu­querque spent more than $343,000 for the quar­ter and $908,000 for Jan­u­ary through Sep­tem­ber, while Harry Teague of Hobbs spent more than $352,000 the last quar­ter and more than $899,000 as of the end of September.

The most expen­sive offices in Con­gress are those of Reps. Steve Kagen, D-Wisc., who spent $452,000 in the last quar­ter, Alan Grayson, D-Fla., who spent $449,000, and Bart Gor­don, D-Tenn., who spent $445,000.

In actu­al­ity, Kagen’s office spent $452,596.  Con­gres­sional offices get a total of $1.5 mil­lion to spend for the entire fis­cal year.

When you add up the spend­ing of the other seven Wis­con­sin Con­gres­sional rep­re­sen­ta­tives, here are their 2009 Quar­ter 3 num­bers from a spread­sheet pro­vided by the Sun­light Foun­da­tion (num­bers rounded to near­est dol­lar): Paul Ryan — $382,733;  Tammy Bald­win — $311,637; Ron Kind — $294,527; Gwen Moore — $268,778; Jim Sensen­bren­ner — $280,077; Tom Petri — $324,509; and Dave Obey — $248,945.

Year to date totals for the Wis­con­sin del­e­ga­tion are: Ryan — $951,904; Bald­win — $922,888; Kind — $931,578; Moore — $817,093; Sensen­bren­ner — $898,976; Petri — $935,137; Obey — $686,796; Kagen — $1,183,739.

Quar­ter 4 is tra­di­tion­ally a time when Con­gres­sional offices will use up their remain­ing bud­gets with fur­ther expen­di­tures.  New office equip­ment (com­put­ers, TV sets, office fur­ni­ture) often will be the major pur­chases.  Any remain­ing money after that is tra­di­tion­ally given back to the fed­eral budget.

So what is Kagen spend­ing so much of your tax dol­lars on; and what will he be able to spend the remain­ing $316,261 on?

Well, as is typ­i­cal, the biggest expense is staff salary.  For Kagen that was $234,350; which puts his office around the aver­age in Con­gress.  Staff salaries are pretty uni­ver­sal in Con­gress with only the years of ser­vice being the only deter­min­ing fac­tor in any dif­fer­ences.  In Kagen’s office, he spent an amaz­ing $59,934 in franked mail­ings, and $79,381 in print­ing and repro­duc­tion costs (most of them related to mak­ing the franked mail­ings).  A detailed look at the tim­ing of these mail­ings show the vast major­ity of them were done right before the August Recess.

(Health Care Bill sales pitches per­haps?  Yeah, those went well if mem­ory serves for the Kagen Office.)

Could some­one in the greater Green Bay-Appleton media remind Kagen about his office’s spend­ing habits the next time he tries to sound like “Mr. Tight-wad with the Gov­ern­ment Purse Strings” on the cam­paign trail next year?  The man’s about as “Fis­cally Con­ser­v­a­tive” a politi­cian as a kid in a candy store.

So far — and I’ve been work­ing on this post for the bet­ter part of a week — the only 8th Dis­trict Repub­li­can to even notice this news is Roof­ing Com­pany Owner Reid Rib­ble, who issued a press release.  My guess is the Roth team is still being assem­bled, and missed this.  The other five run­ning bet­ter have more solid excuses for not jump­ing on prime ammo like this that Kagen gives them.

Be Socia­ble, Share!
Share
  • http://rhymeswithclown.blogspot.com/ Jeremy R. Shown

    Great work. I think let­ting the facts speak for them­selves will go a long way toward defeat­ing Kagen.

  • kneenor

    I know first hand for­mer Cong. Mark Green was a tight wad with spend­ing. He had desks, com­put­ers, etc. that were years old and when Kagen was elected all the stuff had to be returned to the Con­gres­sional offices and they just shook their heads. I wouldn’t doubt it a bit if Kagen went on a spend­ing spree and never stopped. I also know that Cong. Green’s salaries were always on the low end and Kagen has paid his staff right at the top of the salary scale. They don’t call him Dr. Mil­lion­aire for noth­ing folks. He’s used to the good life, yes he’s earned it in his med­ical prac­tice, but now that he’s not prac­tic­ing any­more he con­tin­ues the lifestyle on my dime. I work damn hard for what I earn and to see him throw it away dis­gusts me.
    As much as I like Roth and would vote for him in a heart beat, I think Reid is the can­di­date out in front and the guy to beat right now. Yes­ter­day Jerry Bader had on Mark Savard from Stur­geon Bay, Mark’s a good guy but the inter­view was ter­ri­ble thanks to Jerry’s ques­tions and Mark started out ram­bling about the big snow storm. Really didn’t do any­thing to get my vote.

  • Loretta

    For your reading

  • kneenor

    I know first hand for­mer Cong. Mark Green was a tight wad with spend­ing. He had desks, com­put­ers, etc. that were years old and when Kagen was elected all the stuff had to be returned to the Con­gres­sional offices and they just shook their heads. I wouldn’t doubt it a bit if Kagen went on a spend­ing spree and never stopped. I also know that Cong. Green’s salaries were always on the low end and Kagen has paid his staff right at the top of the salary scale. They don’t call him Dr. Mil­lion­aire for noth­ing folks. He’s used to the good life, yes he’s earned it in his med­ical prac­tice, but now that he’s not prac­tic­ing any­more he con­tin­ues the lifestyle on my dime. I work damn hard for what I earn and to see him throw it away dis­gusts me.
    As much as I like Roth and would vote for him in a heart beat, I think Reid is the can­di­date out in front and the guy to beat right now. Yes­ter­day Jerry Bader had on Mark Savard from Stur­geon Bay, Mark’s a good guy but the inter­view was ter­ri­ble thanks to Jerry’s ques­tions and Mark started out ram­bling about the big snow storm. Really didn’t do any­thing to get my vote.

  • Loretta

    For your reading

  • Jer­rymv

    I am as a farmer amazed that some­one with author­ity in expos­ing spend­ing by con­gress­men can’t use the right “through” instead of “threw”. Pretty basic stuff even for a farmer!. Send is past your proofer, spellcheck won’t catch a blun­der if its spelled cor­rectly, that respon­si­bil­ity goes back to the author. Jerry Supporter

  • Pingback: Off the Jamie Wall » Hard Left Endorses Jamie Wall