Somewhere, in a private library in New York City or Washington, DC, Glenn Greenwald is crying.
His hero has abandoned him.
WASHINGTON — Former Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold, whose lone vote against the Patriot Act made him a hero among civil libertarians, said he has no problem with the killing of U.S.-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in a drone attack in Yemen last fall.
“I’m very pleased that he was taken out,” said Feingold, who spoke to The Huffington Post ahead of the Tuesday release of his new book, “While America Sleeps.” “I do believe he was part and parcel of al Qaeda. I do think it is legitimate to go after al Qaeda operatives.”
The clandestine assassination of an American citizen without a trial sparked a legal and moral debate last year that echoed a similar one after 9/11 as lawmakers drafted the now controversial Patriot Act. A secret Obama administration memo leaked soon after the strike concluded that Awlaki could be legally targeted if it was not possible to capture him alive.
Even as he told The Huffington Post in an interview that “Americans have metaphorically gone back to sleep when it comes to constitutional intrusions in the name of fighting terrorism,” the former member of the Senate Intelligence Committee made clear that in Awlaki’s case, exceptions should be made.
“It is a serious question that they did address and opinionize on that had to do with the difficulty of whether or not you can actually do this with an American citizen,” he said of the decision to kill Awlaki. “It has to do under their analysis with whether there was any way to take him alive. Their claim was they could not, and in that circumstance it appears to be legal.”
But what about the Obama administration’s controversial ratcheting up of drone strikes?
“As to the tactics, I’m not going to speak to the specifics of the drone,” Feingold said. “I was on the intelligence committee and I’m not going to get into that right now.”
The killing of Al-Awlaki has had the civil liberties for terrorists crowd up in arms because the noted Islamic fundamentalist, Al-Queda recruiter, and believed inspiration of the Fort Hood shooting, was an American citizen. So, in their opinion, having the Obama Administration give the okay to have him killed without a trial in the deserts of Yemen was murder.
To have one of the heroes of civil libertarians, especially the lone vote against the Patriot Act, give a verbal approval to the Al-Awlaki drone attack is akin to being stabbed in the back.
Why would Feingold sell them down the river on this issue? The answer simple — Politics.
Despite the “Maverick” reputation which only the media and liberals still believe Feingold possesses, in reality, he’s a party a guy. And after being named a national co-chairman of the Obama re-election, Russ is going to tow the party line with the best of them. And the party line from the Obama White House is “Killing Al-Awlaki was a good thing.”
So of course, now to Russ, “Killing Al-Awlaki was a good thing.”
My opinion on the drone attack — Hey, this SOB was responsible for the killing a high school classmate at Fort Hood, fled the country to avoid justice, and was recruiting for a known terrorist organization. Only one question — U.S. Citizen or not, where do I sign the kill order?